References

Beall, J. (2013). Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access. Learned Publishing, 26(2), 79-+. doi:10.1087/20130203

Beall, J. (2017). Beall’s list: Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access publishers.   Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20170112125427/https:/scholarlyoa.com/publishers/

Beverungen, A., Bohm, S., & Land, C. (2012). The poverty of journal publishing. Organization, 19(6), 929-938. doi:10.1177/1350508412448858

Buranyi, S. (2017). Is the Staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science

Deprez, E. E., & Chen, C. (2017). Medical journals have a fake news problem. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-08-29/medical-journals-have-a-fake-news-problem

pasquale, C. (2014). Five Questions for Jeffrey Beall. Retrieved from https://connections.cu.edu/stories/five-questions-jeffrey-beall

Pirie, I. (2009). The Political Economy of Academic Publishing. Historical Materialism-Research in Critical Marxist Theory, 17(3), 31-60. doi:10.1163/146544609×12469428108466

Strielkowski, W. (2018). Predatory Publishing: What Are the Alternatives to Beall’s List? The American Journal of Medicine, 131(4), 333-334. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.10.054

VSNU. (2018). Open Access Quality.   Retrieved from http://openaccess.nl/en/what-is-open-access/quality