References
Baker, D., Lidster, K., Sottomayor, A., & Amor, S. (2014). Two years later: journals are not yet enforcing the ARRIVE guidelines on reporting standards for pre-clinical animal studies. PLoS Biol, 12(1), e1001756. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001756
BBC (Producer). (2016). Paolo Macchiarini: A surgeon’s downfall. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-37311038
Cohen, D. (2018). Oxford TB vaccine study calls into question selective use of animal data. BMJ, 360.
FDA. Animal Rule Approvals. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/DrugandBiologicApprovalReports/NDAandBLAApprovalReports/ucm578198.htm
Forum, E. F. (2017). Ensuring Value in Research (EViR). Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/view/evir-funders-forum
Freedman, L. P., Cockburn, I. M., & Simcoe, T. S. (2015). The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research. PLoS Biol, 13(6), e1002165. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165
Hooijmans, C. R., & Ritskes-Hoitinga, M. (2013). Progress in using systematic reviews of animal studies to improve translational research. PLoS Med, 10(7), e1001482. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001482
Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol, 8(6), e1000412. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412
Macleod, M. R., Lawson McLean, A., Kyriakopoulou, A., Serghiou, S., de Wilde, A., Sherratt, N., . . . Sena, E. S. (2015). Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement. PLoS Biol, 13(10), e1002273. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002273
O’Collins, V. E., Macleod, M. R., Donnan, G. A., Horky, L. L., van der Worp, B. H., & Howells, D. W. (2006). 1,026 experimental treatments in acute stroke. Ann Neurol, 59(3), 467-477. doi:10.1002/ana.20741
Osborne, N. J., Ritskes-Hoitinga, M., Ahluwahlia, A., Alam, S., Brown, M., Henderson, H., . . . Smith, A. (2017). Letter to the editor – round table unites to tackle culture change in an effort to improve animal research reporting. BMC Veterinary Research, 13(1), 314. doi:10.1186/s12917-017-1235-9
Perel, P., Roberts, I., Sena, E., Wheble, P., Briscoe, C., Sandercock, P., . . . Khan, K. S. (2007). Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ, 334(7586), 197.
Pound, P., & Nicol, C. J. (2018). Retrospective harm benefit analysis of pre-clinical animal research for six treatment interventions. PLOS ONE, 13(3), e0193758. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193758
Ritskes-Hoitinga, M., & Wever, K. (2018). Improving the conduct, reporting, and appraisal of animal research. BMJ, 360.
Sena, E. S. (2017). Impact of an Intervention to Improve Compliance With the ARRIVE Guidelines for the Reporting of In Vivo Animal Research. Paper presented at the 8th International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication – Enhancing the quality and credibility of science, Chicago, IL, USA. https://peerreviewcongress.org/prc17-0296
Sjoqvist, S., Jungebluth, P., Lim, M. L., Haag, J. C., Gustafsson, Y., Lemon, G., . . . Macchiarini, P. (2014). Experimental orthotopic transplantation of a tissue-engineered oesophagus in rats. Nat Commun, 5, 3562. doi:10.1038/ncomms4562
Sjoqvist, S., Jungebluth, P., Lim, M. L., Haag, J. C., Gustafsson, Y., Lemon, G., . . . Macchiarini, P. (2017). Retraction: Experimental orthotopic transplantation of a tissue-engineered oesophagus in rats. Nat Commun, 8, 15077. doi:10.1038/ncomms15077
Smith, A. J., Clutton, R. E., Lilley, E., Hansen, K. E. A., & Brattelid, T. (2018). PREPARE: guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Laboratory Animals, 52(2), 135-141. doi:10.1177/0023677217724823
van der Worp, H. B., Howells, D. W., Sena, E. S., Porritt, M. J., Rewell, S., O’Collins, V., & Macleod, M. R. (2010). Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies? PLoS Med, 7(3), e1000245. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000245
Vesterinen, H. M., Sena, E. S., ffrench-Constant, C., Williams, A., Chandran, S., & Macleod, M. R. (2010). Improving the translational hit of experimental treatments in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler, 16(9), 1044-1055. doi:10.1177/1352458510379612
Wieschowski, S., Chin, W. W. L., Federico, C., Sievers, S., Kimmelman, J., & Strech, D. (2018). Preclinical efficacy studies in investigator brochures: Do they enable risk-benefit assessment? PLoS Biol, 16(4), e2004879. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004879
www.SYRCLE.nl. Retrieved from www.SYRCLE.nl
Yauw, S. T. K., Wever, K. E., Hoesseini, A., Ritskes‐Hoitinga, M., & van Goor, H. (2015). Systematic review of experimental studies on intestinal anastomosis. British Journal of Surgery, 102(7), 726-734. doi:10.1002/bjs.9776