Begley, C. G., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2015). Reproducibility in science. Circulation research, 116(1), 116-126.

Biagioli, M. (2002). From book censorship to academic peer review. Emergences: Journal for the Study of Media & Composite Cultures, 12(1), 11-45.

Dyer, O. (2015). Major publisher retracts 43 papers, alleging fake peer review. Bmj-British Medical Journal, 350. doi:10.1136/bmj.h1783

Gao, J., & Zhou, T. (2017). Stamp out fake peer review. Nature, 546(7656), 33-33. doi:10.1038/546033a

Guston, D. H. (2007). Between politics and science: Assuring the integrity and productivity of reseach: Cambridge University Press.

Hiney, M. (2015). What it Means, Why it Is Important and How we Might Protect it. Retrieved from Brussels:

Horner, J., & Minifie, F. D. (2011). Research Ethics II: Mentoring, Collaboration, Peer Review, and Data Management and Ownership. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 54(1), S330-S345. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0264)

LaFollette, M. C. (1992). Stealing into print: fraud, plagiarism, and misconduct in scientific publishing: Univ of California Press.

Pontille, D., & Torny, D. (2015). From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review. Human Studies, 38(1), 57-79. doi:10.1007/s10746-014-9335-z

Rennie, D. (2003). Editorial peer review: its development and rationale. Peer review in health sciences, 2, 1-13.

Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178-182.

Stern, V. (2017). Publisher issues first retractions for fake peer review, starts new checking policy.  Retrieved from

Stroebe, W., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2012). Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 670-688. doi:10.1177/1745691612460687

Südhof, T. C. (2016). Truth in Science Publishing: A Personal Perspective. PLOS Biology, 14(8), e1002547. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002547